◷You're viewing data from 7 Oct — today's update hasn't been published yet.
MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-10-06
● HARD

Q. Zheng vs A. Charaeva — prediction

✓ Correct
ZHENGWIN PROBABILITYCHARAEVA
67%
model prob.
@1.28
odds · 78% impl.
◐Hard 58%📈Form 5/10 · 2✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇
25°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity◇
15%

Very dry air: the ball travels faster.

Wind◇
7 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #54 vs #118 (better ranked)

›Solid on Hard: 64% career on the surface

›Model 67% vs market 78% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

›Recent form: 5/10 in recent matches

›On a streak: 2 wins in a row

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.48
fair odds
−13.7%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes Q. Zheng the favorite with a 67% win probability, against A. Charaeva's 33% — a solid favorite, though Charaeva keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.48; the offered odds are around @1.28 (a 78% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #54 vs #118 (better ranked); 64% career on the surface; model 67% vs market 78% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds; 5/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 67%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 33 out of every 100 times Charaeva wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →