◷You're viewing data from 7 Oct — today's update hasn't been published yet.
MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-10-06
● HARD

C. Gauff vs E. Mertens — prediction

✗ Missed
GAUFFWIN PROBABILITYMERTENS
81%
model prob.
@1.27
odds · 79% impl.
⚔H2H 5–0 Gauff◐Hard 75%🎾Serve 61%📈Form 9/10 · 8✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇
25°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity◇
15%

Very dry air: the ball travels faster.

Wind◇
7 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #4 vs #19 (better ranked)

›Head-to-head: 5-0 in favor

›Solid on Hard: 71% career on the surface

›Recent form: 9/10 in recent matches

›On a streak: 8 wins in a row

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.24
fair odds
+2.3%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes C. Gauff the favorite with a 81% win probability, against E. Mertens's 19% — a conviction read: the model sees the match clearly leaning one way. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.24; the offered odds are around @1.27 (a 79% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: #4 vs #19 (better ranked); 5-0 in favor; 71% career on the surface; 9/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 81%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 19 out of every 100 times Mertens wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →