S. Bejlek vs M. Inglis — prediction
Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.
Mild: neutral conditions.
Very dry air: the ball travels faster.
Light wind: no noticeable effect.
Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.
›Ranking: #29 vs #140 (better ranked)
›Hard specialist: performs +7% above baseline (58% career on the surface)
›Recent form: 7/10 in recent matches
›On a streak: 2 wins in a row
›More rested: 15d vs opponent's 2d
The model makes S. Bejlek the favorite with a 70% win probability, against M. Inglis's 30% — a solid favorite, though Inglis keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.44; the offered odds are around @1.36 (a 74% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.
Several factors explain the number: #29 vs #140 (better ranked); performs +7% above baseline (58% career on the surface); 7/10 in recent matches; 2 wins in a row.
Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 70%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 30 out of every 100 times Inglis wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.