MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-09-30
● HARD

C. Alcaraz vs A. Michelsen — prediction

✓ Correct
ALCARAZWIN PROBABILITYMICHELSEN
87%
model prob.
@1.13
odds · 88% impl.
⏱Rest 4d vs 22d◐Hard 87%🎾Serve 65%📈Form 8/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇
20°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity◇
81%

Very humid air: the ball gets heavy and points stretch out.

Wind◇
5 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #3 vs #34 (better ranked)

›Solid on Hard: 78% career on the surface

›Recent form: 8/10 in recent matches

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.15
fair odds
−1.9%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes C. Alcaraz the favorite with a 87% win probability, against A. Michelsen's 13% — a conviction read: the model sees the match clearly leaning one way. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.15; the offered odds are around @1.13 (a 88% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: #3 vs #34 (better ranked); 78% career on the surface; 8/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 87%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 13 out of every 100 times Michelsen wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →