MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-09-30
● HARD

A. Zverev vs C. Norrie — prediction

Beijing
✓ Correct
ZVEREVWIN PROBABILITYNORRIE
85%
model prob.
@1.10
odds · 91% impl.
◐Hard 69%🎾Serve 72%📈Form 9/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇
19°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity◇
11%

Very dry air: the ball travels faster.

Wind◇
17 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #2 vs #39 (better ranked)

›Head-to-head: 7-0 in favor

›Solid on Hard: 69% career on the surface

›Model 85% vs market 91% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

›Recent form: 9/10 in recent matches

›Match-sharp: 4 matches in the last 2 weeks

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.18
fair odds
−6.9%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes A. Zverev the favorite with a 85% win probability, against C. Norrie's 15% — a conviction read: the model sees the match clearly leaning one way. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.18; the offered odds are around @1.10 (a 91% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #2 vs #39 (better ranked); 7-0 in favor; 69% career on the surface; model 85% vs market 91% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 85%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 15 out of every 100 times Norrie wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →