Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-09-28
● HARD

M. Lajal vs L. Poullain — prediction

Mouilleron-Le-Captif
✗ Missed
LAJALWIN PROBABILITYPOULLAIN
71%
Elo prob.
@1.25
odds · 80% impl.
⚔H2H 2–0 Lajal⏱Rest 3d vs 5d🎾Serve 65%📈Form 7/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Surface feeds the model — surface specialization is one of its factors.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

›Tour Elo: 1870 vs 1715 — favorite by rating

›Challenger tier · 353 matches in the favorite's track record

›Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.41
fair odds
−11.2%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes M. Lajal the favorite with a 71% win probability, against L. Poullain's 29% — a solid favorite, though Poullain keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.41; the offered odds are around @1.25 (a 80% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: 1870 vs 1715 — favorite by rating; challenger tier · 353 matches in the favorite's track record; these are softer, less-analyzed markets.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 29 out of every 100 times Poullain wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →