MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-09-28
● HARD

K. Kawa vs V. Savinykh — prediction

Beijing
✓ Correct
KAWAWIN PROBABILITYSAVINYKH
55%
model prob.
@1.36
odds · 74% impl.
⏱Rest 14d vs 12d🎾Serve 54%📈Form 3/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇
23°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity◇
63%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind◇
7 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #133 vs #652 (better ranked)

›Model 55% vs market 74% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

›Recent form: 3/10 in recent matches

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.81
fair odds
−24.8%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes K. Kawa the favorite with a 55% win probability, against V. Savinykh's 45% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.81; the offered odds are around @1.36 (a 74% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #133 vs #652 (better ranked); model 55% vs market 74% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds; 3/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 55%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 45 out of every 100 times Savinykh wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →