P. Stearns vs Q. Vandecasteele — prediction

Columbus

Result pending

STEARNSWIN PROBABILITYVANDECASTEELE

57%

Elo prob.

@2.69

odds · 37% impl.

⏱Rest 8d vs 7d◐Hard 46%🎾Serve 57%📈Form 7/10

CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context

Surface◆

Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇

20°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity◇

59%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind◇

15 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

›Tour Elo: 1685 vs 1639 — favorite by rating

›Challenger tier · 203 matches in the favorite's track record

›Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

@1.76

fair odds

+52.5%

expected value

BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes P. Stearns the favorite with a 57% win probability, against Q. Vandecasteele's 43% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.76; the offered odds are around @2.69 (a 37% implied), slightly above the market, so the model is a touch more optimistic.

Several factors explain the number: 1685 vs 1639 — favorite by rating; challenger tier · 203 matches in the favorite's track record; these are softer, less-analyzed markets.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 43 out of every 100 times Vandecasteele wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →

🔒

Full analysis & value verdict is Premium

The value read of P. Stearns vs Q. Vandecasteele — fair odds, expected value, and the factor-by-factor breakdown.

New here? Free account · 3 days of full access