MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-09-14
● CLAY

K. Quevedo vs W. Osuigwe — prediction

Sao Paulo
Result pending
QUEVEDOWIN PROBABILITYOSUIGWE
65%
model prob.
@1.28
odds · 78% impl.
⏱Rest 4d vs 1d◐Clay 43%🎾Serve 55%📈Form 5/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Clay

Slow court, high bounce: longer points, rewards whoever holds up from the baseline.

Temperature◇
16°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity◇
91%

Very humid air: the ball gets heavy and points stretch out.

Wind◇
7 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #105 vs #241 (better ranked)

›Model 65% vs market 78% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

›Recent form: 5/10 in recent matches

›Match-sharp: 4 matches in the last 2 weeks

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.54
fair odds
−16.7%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes K. Quevedo the favorite with a 65% win probability, against W. Osuigwe's 35% — a solid favorite, though Osuigwe keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.54; the offered odds are around @1.28 (a 78% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #105 vs #241 (better ranked); model 65% vs market 78% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds; 5/10 in recent matches; 4 matches in the last 2 weeks.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 65%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 35 out of every 100 times Osuigwe wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →