You're viewing data from 13 Sep — today's update hasn't been published yet.
MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-09-13
CLAY

A. Parks vs V. Lepchenkoprediction

Guadalajara
Result pending
PARKSWIN PROBABILITYLEPCHENKO
64%
model prob.
@1.48
odds · 68% impl.
Rest 14d vs 4dClay 39%🎾Serve 56%📈Form 4/10 · 3✗
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Clay

Slow court, high bounce: longer points, rewards whoever holds up from the baseline.

Temperature
24°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
66%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind
7 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Altitude
1566 m

High altitude: thin air, faster ball and longer bounce.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #79 vs #181 (better ranked)

Recent form: 5/10 in recent matches

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.57
fair odds
−5.9%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes A. Parks the favorite with a 64% win probability, against V. Lepchenko's 36% — a solid favorite, though Lepchenko keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.57; the offered odds are around @1.48 (a 68% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #79 vs #181 (better ranked); 5/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 64%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 36 out of every 100 times Lepchenko wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →