You're viewing data from 6 Sep — today's update hasn't been published yet.
MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-09-04
HARD

A. Zverev vs Q. Halysprediction

ZVEREVWIN PROBABILITYHALYS
86%
model prob.
@1.18
odds · 85% impl.
H2H 3–0 ZverevRest 2d vs 4dHard 69%🎾Serve 66%📈Form 7/10 · 2✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
29°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
43%

Dry air: the ball travels normally.

Wind
20 km/h

Some wind: makes baseline control harder.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #2 vs #52 (better ranked)

Head-to-head: 2-0 in favor

Solid on Hard: 69% career on the surface

Recent form: 7/10 in recent matches

On a streak: 2 wins in a row

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.16
fair odds
+1.9%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes A. Zverev the favorite with a 86% win probability, against Q. Halys's 14% — a conviction read: the model sees the match clearly leaning one way. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.16; the offered odds are around @1.18 (a 85% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: #2 vs #52 (better ranked); 2-0 in favor; 69% career on the surface; 7/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 86%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 14 out of every 100 times Halys wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →