MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-23
HARD

A. Walton vs J. De Jongprediction

Winston-Salem
Result pending
WALTONWIN PROBABILITYJONG
51%
model prob.
@1.48
odds · 68% impl.
Rest 5d vs 2dHard 38%🎾Serve 65%📈Form 5/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
29°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
37%

Dry air: the ball travels normally.

Wind
10 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #98 vs #106 (better ranked)

Recent form: 4/10 in recent matches

Match-sharp: 3 matches in the last 2 weeks

Model 51% vs market 68% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.96
fair odds
−24.6%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes A. Walton the favorite with a 51% win probability, against J. De Jong's 49% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.96; the offered odds are around @1.48 (a 68% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #98 vs #106 (better ranked); 4/10 in recent matches; 3 matches in the last 2 weeks; model 51% vs market 68% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 51%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 49 out of every 100 times Jong wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →