MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-16
HARD

T. Paul vs D. Vallejoprediction

Result pending
PAULWIN PROBABILITYVALLEJO
68%
model prob.
@1.24
odds · 81% impl.
H2H 1–0 PaulHard 65%🎾Serve 66%📈Form 6/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
31°C

Strong heat: warm air speeds the ball up and physical wear tells in long matches.

Humidity
57%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind
16 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #24 vs #70 (better ranked)

Recent form: 6/10 in recent matches

Head-to-head: 1-0 in favor

Solid on Hard: 60% career on the surface

Model 68% vs market 81% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.47
fair odds
−15.6%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes T. Paul the favorite with a 68% win probability, against D. Vallejo's 32% — a solid favorite, though Vallejo keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.47; the offered odds are around @1.24 (a 81% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #24 vs #70 (better ranked); 6/10 in recent matches; 1-0 in favor; 60% career on the surface.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 68%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 32 out of every 100 times Vallejo wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →