MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-14
HARD

S. Kraus vs S. Stephensprediction

✗ Missed
KRAUSWIN PROBABILITYSTEPHENS
54%
model prob.
@1.72
odds · 58% impl.
Rest 1d vs 9dHard 20%🎾Serve 55%📈Form 8/10 · 2✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
28°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
70%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind
4 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #85 vs #240 (better ranked)

Recent form: 1/10 in recent matches

More rested: 23d vs opponent's 9d

WATCH FOR

!Returning from a long layoff (23d) — possible rustiness

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.86
fair odds
−7.5%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes S. Kraus the favorite with a 54% win probability, against S. Stephens's 46% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.86; the offered odds are around @1.72 (a 58% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #85 vs #240 (better ranked); 1/10 in recent matches; 23d vs opponent's 9d.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 54%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 46 out of every 100 times Stephens wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. Watch out for: Returning from a long layoff (23d) — possible rustiness. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →