ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-08-14
HARD

R. Bertrand vs G. Marquesprediction

M25 Idanha-a-Nova
BERTRANDWIN PROBABILITYMARQUES
68%
Elo prob.
@1.36
odds · 74% impl.
🎾Serve 56%📈Form 6/10 · 2✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Surface feeds the model — surface specialization is one of its factors.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1640 vs 1507 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 440 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.46
fair odds
−7.2%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes R. Bertrand the favorite with a 68% win probability, against G. Marques's 32% — a solid favorite, though Marques keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.46; the offered odds are around @1.36 (a 74% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: 1640 vs 1507 — favorite by rating; itf tier · 440 matches in the favorite's track record; these are softer, less-analyzed markets.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 32 out of every 100 times Marques wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →