MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-11
● HARD

C. Gauff vs B. Bencic — prediction

Toronto
GAUFFWIN PROBABILITYBENCIC
64%
model prob.
@1.61
odds · 62% impl.
⚔H2H 7–2 Gauff⏱Rest 2d vs 1d◐Hard 72%🎾Serve 62%📈Form 8/10 · 6✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCH◆ in the model◇ context
Surface◆
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature◇
28°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity◇
39%

Dry air: the ball travels normally.

Wind◇
14 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

›Ranking: #4 vs #14 (better ranked)

›Head-to-head: 6-2 in favor

›Solid on Hard: 71% career on the surface

›Recent form: 8/10 in recent matches

›On a streak: 6 wins in a row

›Match-sharp: 6 matches in the last 2 weeks

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.56
fair odds
+3.2%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes C. Gauff the favorite with a 64% win probability, against B. Bencic's 36% — a solid favorite, though Bencic keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.56; the offered odds are around @1.61 (a 62% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: #4 vs #14 (better ranked); 6-2 in favor; 71% career on the surface; 8/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 64%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 36 out of every 100 times Bencic wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →