You're viewing data from 8 Aug — today's update hasn't been published yet.
ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-08-08
GRASS

O. Tarvet vs A. Matusevichprediction

M25 Roehampton
✓ Correct
TARVETWIN PROBABILITYMATUSEVICH
56%
Elo prob.
@1.30
odds · 77% impl.
🎾Serve 68%📈Form 9/10 · 7✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Grass

Fast court, low bounce: rewards the serve and short points.

Surface feeds the model — surface specialization is one of its factors.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1815 vs 1776 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 81 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.80
fair odds
−27.8%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes O. Tarvet the favorite with a 56% win probability, against A. Matusevich's 44% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.80; the offered odds are around @1.30 (a 77% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: 1815 vs 1776 — favorite by rating; itf tier · 81 matches in the favorite's track record; these are softer, less-analyzed markets.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 44 out of every 100 times Matusevich wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →