You're viewing data from 8 Aug — today's update hasn't been published yet.
ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-08-07
HARD

M. Dellavedova vs I. Becroftprediction

M15 Tianjin
✓ Correct
DELLAVEDOVAWIN PROBABILITYBECROFT
72%
Elo prob.
@1.38
odds · 72% impl.
H2H 1–0 Dellavedova📈Form 8/10 · 3✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Surface feeds the model — surface specialization is one of its factors.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1766 vs 1606 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 422 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.40
fair odds
−1.3%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes M. Dellavedova the favorite with a 72% win probability, against I. Becroft's 28% — a solid favorite, though Becroft keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.40; the offered odds are around @1.38 (a 72% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: 1766 vs 1606 — favorite by rating; itf tier · 422 matches in the favorite's track record; these are softer, less-analyzed markets.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 28 out of every 100 times Becroft wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →