MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-04
HARD

J. Ostapenko vs S. Zhangprediction

Toronto
✗ Missed
OSTAPENKOWIN PROBABILITYZHANG
67%
model prob.
@1.43
odds · 70% impl.
Hard 46%🎾Serve 63%
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
25°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
50%

Dry air: the ball travels normally.

Wind
13 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #31 vs #64 (better ranked)

Recent form: 7/10 in recent matches

WATCH FOR

!Returning from a long layoff (32d) — possible rustiness

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.49
fair odds
−4.3%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes J. Ostapenko the favorite with a 67% win probability, against S. Zhang's 33% — a solid favorite, though Zhang keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.49; the offered odds are around @1.43 (a 70% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: #31 vs #64 (better ranked); 7/10 in recent matches.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 67%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 33 out of every 100 times Zhang wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. Watch out for: Returning from a long layoff (32d) — possible rustiness. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →