ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-08-04
HARD

D. De Jonge vs V. Gonzalez-Galinoprediction

M25+H Tauste
✓ Correct
JONGEWIN PROBABILITYGONZALEZ-GALINO
76%
Elo prob.
@1.13
odds · 88% impl.
Rest 3d vs 14d🎾Serve 63%📈Form 6/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Surface feeds the model — surface specialization is one of its factors.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1618 vs 1421 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 133 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.32
fair odds
−14.5%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes D. De Jonge the favorite with a 76% win probability, against V. Gonzalez-Galino's 24% — a conviction read: the model sees the match clearly leaning one way. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.32; the offered odds are around @1.13 (a 88% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.

Several factors explain the number: 1618 vs 1421 — favorite by rating; itf tier · 133 matches in the favorite's track record; these are softer, less-analyzed markets.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 24 out of every 100 times Gonzalez-Galino wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →