ATP · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-08-02
HARD

G. Mpetshi Perricard vs B. Van De Zandschulpprediction

Result pending
PERRICARDWIN PROBABILITYZANDSCHULP
50%
Elo prob.
@2.10
odds · 48% impl.
🎾Serve 71%
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
23°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity
87%

Very humid air: the ball gets heavy and points stretch out.

Wind
9 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1845 vs 1845 — favorite by rating

ATP qualifying / early round · 297 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): qualifying draws have no clean main-tour history

WATCH FOR

!Qualifying/soft context: Elo estimate only — read the round context (already-through, lucky loser, dead rubber) from the dossier; it is not a proven edge.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@2.00
fair odds
+5.2%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · ELO ESTIMATE

The model makes G. Mpetshi Perricard the favorite with a 50% win probability, against B. Van De Zandschulp's 50% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @2.00; the offered odds are around @2.10 (a 48% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: 1845 vs 1845 — favorite by rating; atp qualifying / early round · 297 matches in the favorite's track record; qualifying draws have no clean main-tour history.

Read it with caution. This number does NOT come from the ATP factor model, but from the tour's real Elo: it ranks who is the favorite well, but it is a coarser estimate. Being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 50 out of every 100 times Zandschulp wins. And above all, in Challenger/ITF the value edge is not proven live, so treat it as a reference, not an opportunity. Watch out for: Qualifying/soft context: Elo estimate only — read the round context (already-through, lucky loser, dead rubber) from the dossier; it is not a proven edge.. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →