ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-29

M. Bouzige vs Z. Stevensprediction

M15 Brisbane 2
✓ Correct
BOUZIGEWIN PROBABILITYSTEVENS
67%
Elo prob.
@1.29
odds · 78% impl.
Rest 5d vs 14d📈Form 5/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Temperature
21°C

Mild: neutral conditions.

Humidity
44%

Dry air: the ball travels normally.

Wind
8 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Context we publish for you: these conditions do NOT move the model probability.

WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1589 vs 1466 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 304 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.49
fair odds
−13.5%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Bouzige●●●
Bouzige's 1589 Elo vs Stevens' 1466 supports the 67% model probability, though the market prices him higher at 78%.
Rest▸ Stevens●●
Stevens enters on 14 days' rest and just 1 match in 14 days, versus Bouzige's 5 days off and 4 matches — freshness favors Stevens.
Form▸ Bouzige
Bouzige is 5-5 in his last 10, edging Stevens' 4-6, a marginal recent-form advantage.
Weather= Even
Mild 21°C, 44% humidity and light 8 km/h wind create no distinct edge for either player; no serve/return data to link a mechanism.
Market Value= Even●●●
Odds of 1.29 imply 78% versus the model's 67%, producing a -13.5% expected value — the price already exceeds the model's confidence.
LEVEL GAP

The Elo gap of 123 points (1589 vs 1466) is the clearest structural edge in this match, translating into a 67% win probability for Bouzige under the model. This is an ITF-tier, Challenger-style Elo estimate, though, drawn from a softer, less-analyzed market — it should be read as a reasonable baseline rather than a precise measurement.

The market's 78% implied probability sits well above the model's 67%, meaning bettors are pricing Bouzige even more heavily than the rating gap alone would justify. That gap between model and market is worth noting before treating the favorite tag as automatic value.

FATIGUE VS FRESHNESS

Rest patterns cut against the favorite here. Bouzige has played 4 matches in the last 14 days and comes in on just 5 days' rest, while Stevens arrives fresher with only 1 match in that span and a full 14 days off. Physical load over a short window can matter more in best-of-three ITF matches, where recovery between rounds is limited.

Compounding this, Bouzige reached the quarterfinals at the same M15 Brisbane event 5 days ago — a context flag suggesting possible deep-run fatigue. This doesn't get converted into a number in our model, but it's a real scheduling consideration that leans slightly toward Stevens holding up physically better over the distance.

FORM READ

Recent form is close to a wash. Bouzige is 5-5 in his last 10 matches, Stevens 4-6 — a one-match difference that offers only a marginal signal in Bouzige's favor. Neither player shows a listed quality win, so there's no evidence of a notable scalp elevating either side's recent trajectory.

Weather conditions (21°C, 44% humidity, 8 km/h wind, described as mild and dry) are unremarkable and, without surface or serve/return data on file, don't translate into a specific mechanism favoring either player in this matchup.

VALUE CHECK

Being the favorite is not the same as offering value. Bouzige's Elo-based win probability sits at 67%, but the market prices him at an implied 78% (odds of 1.29). That mismatch produces a -13.5% expected value on the favorite at this price — the market is more confident in Bouzige than the rating gap supports.

This is a soft Challenger/ITF market, so any edge here is unproven and should be treated as an estimate, not a live opportunity. Combined with Bouzige's heavier recent workload and the deep-run fatigue flag, there's enough uncertainty that backing the favorite at 1.29 looks like paying a premium rather than finding value.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →