HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Moutet●●
Moutet's #39 ranking beats Brooksby's #81 (trend -18), yet the baseline model has them nearly even at 47% vs 48%.
Serve/return▸ Brooksby●●●
Brooksby wins 38% of return points vs Moutet's 32%, a real edge that can offset Moutet's slightly higher 63% serve rate.
Form▸ Moutet●●
Brooksby is 1-10 in his last ten with a -1 streak, tempering the value of his win over I. Buse (Elo 1920).
Rest▸ Moutet●
Brooksby's 26-day layoff with zero matches in 14 days flags possible rustiness after inactivity.
Head-to-head▸ Moutet●
Moutet leads their head-to-head 1-0, though a single prior meeting is a thin sample to lean on.
RETURN BATTLE
The clearest mechanical edge in this match sits on the return side. Brooksby's 38% return-points-won figure is well above Moutet's 32%, meaning Brooksby is statistically the better returner of the two even though both serve at a similar clip (64% vs 63%). In practice, that gap suggests Brooksby is more likely to generate break chances on Moutet's serve than Moutet is on his, which can matter more than raw serve numbers in tight sets.
FORM VS LAYOFF
Brooksby's underlying numbers are undercut by his recent form: a 1-10 record over his last ten matches and a current one-match losing streak. His one notable result, a win over I. Buse (Elo 1920), is the exception rather than the rule right now. Layered on top of that is a 26-day gap since his last match with zero matches in the past two weeks — a long idle stretch that raises the risk of match rustiness, even if it also means fresher legs physically.
RANKING VS MODEL GAP
On paper, Moutet's #39 ranking versus Brooksby's #81 (with a -18 ranking trend) looks like a clear separation in level. But the baseline model narrows that gap considerably, putting the two players at 47% and 48% before other adjustments — essentially a coin flip. That tells us the ranking differential alone is not doing much work here; the model is treating this as a close contest despite the ranking optics.
VALUE READ
The model gives Moutet a 52% win probability against a market-implied 50% at odds of 2.01, producing a modest 4.5% expected value. That is a small edge, not a strong signal — the model and the market are essentially in agreement here, with only a marginal lean toward Moutet. Given Brooksby's return-game advantage and Moutet's own edge in ranking and form, this reads as a genuinely close match rather than a mispriced one. Any position taken should reflect that thin margin, not a conviction that Moutet is clearly the better side.
Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.