ATP · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-26

T. Boyer vs L. Claverieprediction

✓ Correct
BOYERWIN PROBABILITYCLAVERIE
76%
Elo prob.
@1.11
odds · 90% impl.
Rest 3d vs 7d🎾Serve 63%📈Form 6/10 · 2✗
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1777 vs 1579 — favorite by rating

ATP qualifying / early round · 205 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): qualifying draws have no clean main-tour history

WATCH FOR

!Qualifying/soft context: Elo estimate only — read the round context (already-through, lucky loser, dead rubber) from the dossier; it is not a proven edge.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.32
fair odds
−15.8%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Boyer●●●
Elo gap (1777 vs 1579) and Boyer's rank of 191 back a solid edge, though the baseline model only gives him 33%, well below Elo's 76%.
Serve/Return= Even●●
Claverie's serve (70%) tops Boyer's (63%), but Boyer's return (39% vs 34%) offsets it — a close service battle overall.
Form▸ Claverie
Claverie's last10 (7-3) edges Boyer's (6-4); both share a -2 streak, so momentum is only marginally with the opponent.
Rest▸ Claverie
Claverie has 7 days' rest versus Boyer's 3, giving him a freshness edge heading into this single match.
Market Value= Even●●●
Odds of 1.11 imply 90% for Boyer, well above the model's 76% — expected value is -15.8%, meaning no backed value on the favorite.
LEVEL AND RATING

The Elo gap of 1777 to 1579 is the clearest structural edge in this match, and Boyer's ATP ranking of 191 (with no equivalent number for Claverie) reinforces that he operates at a higher competitive tier. This rating differential is the main reason the model leans toward Boyer at 76%.

However, the baseline_favorite figure of 33% — a separate, more conservative estimate — sits far below the Elo-driven probability. This divergence signals that the model's confidence in Boyer is not uniform across its inputs, and the true skill gap may be smaller than the headline Elo number suggests.

SERVE VS RETURN

On service metrics, Claverie actually holds the higher percentage (70% vs Boyer's 63%), which would normally suggest he's the more dominant server in this matchup. Without surface or conditions data, it's hard to project how that translates into games won, but the raw numbers make him the stronger service performer on paper.

Boyer partially compensates on return, winning 39% of return points compared to Claverie's 34%. This five-point return advantage suggests Boyer breaks serve more often than his own serve percentage alone would imply, keeping the service battle closer than the level gap suggests.

FORM AND FRESHNESS

Recent form is close: Claverie's last10 reads 7-3 against Boyer's 6-4, and both are on identical two-match losing streaks. Neither man's form data includes quality wins, so this comparison stays surface-level, but Claverie's slightly better record is worth noting.

Rest also tilts toward Claverie, who has had 7 days since his last match compared to Boyer's 3. Both played only one match in the last 14 days, so workload is similar, but the extra recovery time may help Claverie's legs in a tightly contested match.

VALUE READ

The market prices Boyer at 1.11, implying a 90% win probability — well above the model's 76% Elo-based estimate. That 14-point gap produces a expected value of -15.8%, a clear signal that backing the favorite at this price offers no statistical edge.

This is an Elo-based estimate in a soft Challenger/ITF-style market, so any edge here is inherently unproven. Boyer remains the more likely winner given his rating and ranking, but being the favorite is not the same as being a value bet — at these odds, the numbers do not support a wager on him.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →