HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Snigur●●●
Snigur leads Elo 1664-1588 and ranking #77-#99; her 53% baseline reflects a stronger overall level.
Form▸ Tararudee●●
Tararudee's 7-match win streak (8-2 last 10) outpaces Snigur's 7-3 mark, though Snigur owns a win over Svitolina (Elo 1917).
Rest▸ Snigur●●
Tararudee played 7 matches in 14 days versus Snigur's 2, raising fatigue risk despite similar single-day rest.
Serve/return▸ Snigur●
Serve rates are nearly equal (61% vs 62%), but Snigur's 46% return edges Tararudee's 43%, a slight advantage.
Model vs Market= Even●●
Model gives Snigur 55% while odds imply 61%, producing a -9.7% EV — a negative-value price.
LEVEL AND MOMENTUM
Snigur's Elo advantage (1664 vs 1588) and ranking edge (#77 vs #99) point to a stronger baseline level, reinforced by her 53% baseline win rate. Her marquee win over Svitolina (Elo 1917) shows she can lift her game against elite competition.
That said, Tararudee arrives red-hot: seven straight wins and an 8-2 record over her last ten matches. This kind of sustained momentum can offset a class gap on paper, especially in a single match rather than a season-long sample.
SCHEDULE AND FATIGUE
Both players are on short turnaround — one day of rest for Tararudee, two for Snigur — but their recent workloads diverge sharply. Tararudee has played seven matches in the last two weeks against Snigur's two, a load that raises the risk of accumulated physical fatigue.
Even with similar single-day rest, that gap in total matches played can show up in footspeed, reaction time, and shot tolerance as a match wears on, tilting the physical edge toward Snigur.
SERVE VS RETURN
The serve numbers are almost a wash: Snigur wins 61% of service points, Tararudee 62%. Neither player projects to dominate on serve, so the match is likely to hinge on return games and break-point moments.
Here Snigur holds a modest edge, winning 46% of return points compared to Tararudee's 43%. A three-point gap on return, paired with near-identical serve numbers, gives Snigur a slight structural advantage in tight games.
VALUE READ
The model places Snigur's win probability at 55%, notably below the market's implied 61% at odds of 1.65. That gap translates into a -9.7% expected value, meaning the price does not compensate for the model's assessed risk.
Being favored is not the same as being a value bet: on these numbers, the market is pricing Snigur more confidently than the model supports. This does not mean she loses, only that the current odds do not reward backing her.
Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.