MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-07-23

B. Krejcikova vs L. Havlickovaprediction

Livesport Prague Open
✓ Correct
KREJCIKOVAWIN PROBABILITYHAVLICKOVA
84%
model prob.
@1.12
odds · 89% impl.
Rest 2d vs 3d🎾Serve 61%📈Form 8/10 · 6✓
THE MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #32 vs #276 (better ranked)

Recent form: 8/10 in recent matches

On a streak: 5 wins in a row

Match-sharp: 5 matches in the last 2 weeks

Model 84% vs market 89% → the model sees it as less likely than the odds

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.19
fair odds
−6.0%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Krejcikova●●●
Elo gap (1820 vs 1428) and ranking (#32 vs #276) drive an 84% baseline probability for Krejcikova.
Form▸ Krejcikova●●●
Krejcikova is 8/10 with a 6-match streak and a win over Andreeva (Elo 1906); Havlickova is 2/10 with one streak win.
Serve/return▸ Krejcikova●●
Krejcikova's 61% serve and 47% return both top Havlickova's 55% serve and 46% return, giving edges on both ends of the point.
Rest▸ Krejcikova
Krejcikova played 6 matches in 14 days (match-sharp) vs Havlickova's 2, though tighter recovery (2 vs 3 days) could add slight fatigue.
Market value▸ Havlickova●●
Model gives 84% vs market's 90% implied by 1.11 odds, producing a -6.9% EV — no betting value despite the clear favorite status.
CLASS GAP

The Elo difference (1820 vs 1428) and the ranking split (#32 vs #276) reflect a substantial quality gap between the two players, which the model translates into an 84% win probability for Krejcikova. This is a matchup between an established tour player and someone ranked nearly 250 spots lower, and the numbers back up the size of that gap rather than just the label of 'favorite'.

Krejcikova's rising ranking trend (+9) versus Havlickova's flat trend (0) suggests the gap in current trajectory is not closing, reinforcing the model's read on level.

FORM MOMENTUM

Krejcikova's recent form is strong: 8 wins in her last 10 matches, a current 6-match win streak, and a notable victory over M. Andreeva (Elo 1906) that shows she can beat elite-level opposition. That combination points to a player playing with confidence heading into this match.

Havlickova, by contrast, has won only 2 of her last 10 and is riding just a single-match win streak with no quality wins logged. The contrast in trajectories — surging favorite against a struggling opponent — adds another layer of separation beyond the raw rankings.

SERVE AND SCHEDULE

On serve, Krejcikova holds a clear edge (61% vs 55%), and she also returns slightly better (47% vs 46%), meaning she projects to win more points regardless of who is serving. Neither returner number is dominant, so long service games and closer point-margins are still possible, but the aggregate edge sits with the favorite.

Scheduling is a mixed signal: Krejcikova has played six matches in the last two weeks against Havlickova's two, which supports match sharpness but also raises modest fatigue risk given only two days since her last outing versus the opponent's three. This factor is secondary to the level and form gaps.

VALUE CHECK

Krejcikova is a clear favorite on merit — level, form and serve/return numbers all point her way — but being favored is not the same as being a value bet. The model puts her win probability at 84%, while the market, via 1.11 odds, implies roughly 90%. That gap produces a -6.9% expected value.

In practical terms, the market is pricing this match slightly more confidently in Krejcikova's favor than the model believes is justified. Backing the favorite at this price does not offer a statistical edge based on this model; it simply reflects a lopsided matchup that the odds have already priced in, and then some.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →