ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-22

Y. Takahashi vs T. Boosarawongseprediction

M15 Bali
✗ Missed
TAKAHASHIWIN PROBABILITYBOOSARAWONGSE
66%
Elo prob.
@1.41
odds · 71% impl.
Rest 1d vs 7d📈Form 4/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1577 vs 1463 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 276 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.52
fair odds
−7.0%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Takahashi●●●
Takahashi's 1577 Elo tops Boosarawongse's 1463, translating to a 66% model win probability on rating alone.
Form▸ Takahashi●●
Takahashi's last 10 shows 4 wins (WLWLLLWLLW) versus only 2 for Boosarawongse (LLLLLLWLLW), a modest recent edge.
Rest▸ Boosarawongse●●
Takahashi played on 1 day's rest with 2 matches in 14 days; Boosarawongse rested 7 days, easing fatigue for the underdog.
Market Value= Even●●●
Market implies 71% at 1.41 odds versus the model's 66%, producing a -7% EV — no edge despite the favorite tag.
RATING GAP

The core signal here is the Elo differential: 1577 for Takahashi against 1463 for Boosarawongse, a gap wide enough to generate a 66% favorite probability in a soft ITF market. This is a rating-driven edge, not one confirmed by surface, serve, or return data, all of which are unavailable in this match.

Because this is an Elo-based estimate rather than a fully specified factor model, treat the 66% as a reasonable but unproven starting point. The tier itself (M15 Challenger/ITF) means the market is thinner and historically less efficient than tour-level ATP markets.

FORM AND FATIGUE

Recent form tilts modestly toward Takahashi, who has won 4 of his last 10 matches compared to just 2 for Boosarawongse. Neither player shows a notable win streak (both sit at 1), so this is a mild tailwind rather than a decisive one.

Schedule congestion cuts the other way: Takahashi is playing on just 1 day of rest with 2 matches in the last 14 days, while Boosarawongse enters fresher off 7 days of rest and only 1 match in that span. Over a best-of-three ITF match this fatigue differential is a real but secondary drag on the favorite.

HONEST VALUE READ

The model favors Takahashi to win at 66%, but the market prices him even higher at an implied 71% (odds of 1.41). That gap produces a -7% expected value, meaning the price does not compensate for the model's own uncertainty — this is a case where being the favorite does not equal having betting value.

Given the soft nature of Challenger/ITF markets, the Elo edge here is unproven in practice, and the rest disadvantage adds a plausible drag not fully captured in the rating gap. On balance, backing the favorite at this price is not supported by the data; the honest read is a pass rather than a value play.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →