MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-07-22

S. Bejlek vs M. Timofeevaprediction

Livesport Prague Open
✓ Correct
BEJLEKWIN PROBABILITYTIMOFEEVA
61%
model prob.
@1.54
odds · 65% impl.
🎾Serve 54%📈Form 5/10
THE MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #42 vs #79 (better ranked)

Recent form: 4/10 in recent matches

Match-sharp: 3 matches in the last 2 weeks

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.63
fair odds
−5.6%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Bejlek●●●
Bejlek's Elo edge (1662 vs 1538) and ranking (#42 vs #79) drive the 61% baseline, well above a 50-50 line.
Serve/return▸ Timofeeva●●
Timofeeva serves better (57% vs 54%) and returns better (49% vs 45%), giving her the edge in both phases of play.
Form▸ Timofeeva
Model notes Bejlek at 4/10 recent form while Timofeeva's last 10 (WLLWWWWLLW) shows more wins, pointing to sharper current form for the opponent.
Rest▸ Timofeeva
Bejlek has played 5 matches in 14 days versus Timofeeva's 2, adding fatigue risk for the favorite despite both having 1 day of rest.
CLASS GAP

The Elo difference (1662 vs 1538) and the ranking split (#42 vs #79) are the clearest structural edge in this match, and they explain most of Bejlek's 61% baseline probability. This is a real quality gap on paper, not a marginal one, and it's the main reason she's favored.

Still, a 61% baseline is far from dominant — it leaves real room for an upset, especially once the underlying serve/return numbers are considered.

SERVE VS RETURN

The style numbers cut against the ranking gap: Timofeeva serves at 57% versus Bejlek's 54%, and also returns better (49% to 45%). That means Timofeeva has the statistical edge in both service holds and return pressure, a rare double advantage for the lower-ranked player.

This mismatch between class (favors Bejlek) and current serve/return efficiency (favors Timofeeva) is the central tension of this match — it suggests the contest could be closer than the ranking gap implies.

FORM AND SCHEDULE

Recent match rhythm slightly favors Timofeeva: her last-10 string (WLLWWWWLLW) reflects more wins than the 4/10 form noted for Bejlek. Combined with a lighter workload — 2 matches in the last 14 days versus Bejlek's 5 — Timofeeva arrives fresher and in better recent touch.

None of this overturns the class gap, but it does chip away at Bejlek's edge and adds a plausible path for the opponent to compete deep into the match.

VALUE CHECK

The market prices Bejlek at an implied 65% (odds 1.55), while the model's calibrated estimate is 61% — a 4-point gap that produces a negative expected value of -5%. That means, on average, this is not a price worth taking based on the model's own numbers.

Being the favorite is not the same as being a source of value here. Given the serve/return reversal and the rest/form tilt toward Timofeeva, this looks like a fair or slightly overpriced favorite rather than an edge for backers.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →