ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-22

D. Siniakov vs L. Poertnerprediction

M25 Metzingen
✓ Correct
SINIAKOVWIN PROBABILITYPOERTNER
74%
Elo prob.
@1.45
odds · 69% impl.
Rest 8d vs 5d🎾Serve 60%📈Form 6/10 · 2✗
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1656 vs 1475 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 139 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.35
fair odds
+7.2%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Siniakov●●●
Elo gap of 181 points (1656 vs 1475) drives a 74% model win probability, above the market's 71% implied line.
Serve/return▸ Siniakov●●
Siniakov holds serve at 60% and wins 43% of return points, a balanced profile; no comparable numbers exist for Poertner.
Form▸ Siniakov●●
Siniakov won 6 of his last 10 matches versus Poertner's 4, though Siniakov is on a 2-match skid.
Rest▸ Siniakov
Poertner has only 5 days since his last match versus Siniakov's 8, leaving less recovery time for the opponent.
Schedule/Fatigue▸ Siniakov
Poertner reached the quarterfinals at M15 Uslar just 5 days ago, adding physical load ahead of this match.
ELO GAP

The core signal here is rating separation: Siniakov's 1656 Elo sits 181 points above Poertner's 1475, translating into a 74% model win probability. That is a meaningful gap for the ITF level, reflecting a clear quality difference over this data sample.

FORM AND SERVE PROFILE

Recent form tilts toward Siniakov, who won 6 of his last 10 matches compared to Poertner's 4, even though Siniakov arrives on a 2-match losing streak. His serve numbers (60% service points won, 43% return points won) show a functional all-court game, but no equivalent data exists for Poertner, so a direct stylistic comparison isn't possible here — the edge stands on Elo and recent results rather than a shot-by-shot mechanism.

REST AND WORKLOAD

Both players have played 4 matches in the last 14 days, so the workload is similar in volume. The difference is recovery time: Poertner has had only 5 days since his last match versus Siniakov's 8, and that match was a quarterfinal run at M15 Uslar. This tighter turnaround adds a small physical tax on Poertner heading into this contest, though the data flags it as context rather than a quantified probability shift.

VALUE READ

The model's 74% for Siniakov is only 3 points above the market's implied 71%, producing a modest +4.2% expected value at 1.41 odds. This is a soft Elo-based estimate for a Challenger/ITF match, where pricing is less efficient and the edge is unproven in practice — treat it as a marginal, not decisive, signal.

Being the favorite here is not the same as holding a strong value position: the market has already priced most of the Elo gap. This looks like a fair, closely aligned assessment between model and market rather than a clear mispricing.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →