ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-20

Y. Takahashi vs Y. Tomidaprediction

M15 Bali
✓ Correct
TAKAHASHIWIN PROBABILITYTOMIDA
66%
Elo prob.
@1.30
odds · 77% impl.
Rest 11d vs 4d📈Form 3/10 · 2✗
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1569 vs 1456 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 275 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.52
fair odds
−14.5%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Takahashi●●●
Takahashi's 1569 Elo vs Tomida's 1456 drives the 66% model probability, a clear rating gap favoring the favorite.
Form= Even●●
Both arrive cold: Takahashi 4-6 in his last 10 (streak -2), Tomida 4-6 (streak -1) — no edge either way.
Rest▸ Takahashi●●
Tomida played 3 matches in 14 days (last just 4 days ago) vs Takahashi's single match in 11 days, raising fatigue risk for the opponent.
Experience/Tier▸ Takahashi
275 tracked matches for Takahashi at this ITF level suggest more tour experience than the data shows for Tomida.
RATING GAP

The core of this line is the Elo differential: 1569 for Takahashi against 1456 for Tomida, a spread that alone generates the model's 66% favorite probability. In a soft ITF market this gap is the primary signal we have, since no surface, serve, or head-to-head data exists to confirm or contradict it.

Because this is a Challenger/ITF Elo estimate rather than the full ATP factor model, treat the edge as a reasonable prior, not a precise measurement. The rating gap is real, but its predictive power at this level is inherently softer.

RECENT FORM

Neither player is playing well. Takahashi's last 10 reads 4-6 with a current two-match losing streak, while Tomida sits at an almost identical 4-6 with a one-match slide. Neither log includes a listed quality win, so recent form does not tilt the match in either direction.

SCHEDULE LOAD

The rest picture is asymmetric: Tomida has played three times in the last two weeks and stepped onto court just four days ago, while Takahashi has had 11 days off with only one match in that span. Congested scheduling can blunt legs and focus over a match, which mildly supports Takahashi entering fresher, though this is a secondary factor next to the rating gap.

VALUE READ

At odds of 1.30, the market prices Takahashi at roughly 77% to win, well above the model's 66% estimate — a -14.5% expected value gap. Being the favorite here does not equate to being a good bet; the number says the price is short relative to Baseline's read.

This is an Elo-based Challenger/ITF estimate, and such markets are thinner and less analyzed, so the mismatch could reflect either a market overreaction or a real gap in the model's information (no surface, serve, or H2H inputs were available). Given the negative EV, this is not a situation to treat as value — it's one to watch, not to back.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →