MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-07-19

K. Jacquet vs T. Danielprediction

✗ Missed
JACQUETWIN PROBABILITYDANIEL
56%
model prob.
@1.82
odds · 55% impl.
H2H 2–0 Jacquet🎾Serve 67%📈Form 7/10
THE MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #139 vs #168 (better ranked)

Recent form: 3/10 in recent matches

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.78
fair odds
+2.4%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Jacquet●●
Jacquet leads Elo 1894-1842 and ranks 139 vs 168, with a +8 rising trend, matching the model's 56% probability.
Head-to-head▸ Jacquet●●
Jacquet has won both prior meetings, including a 2025 ATP match, though the two-match sample caps its weight.
Form▸ Daniel
Daniel's 8-2 last10 tops Jacquet's 7-3, and his win over Piros (Elo 1932) outranks Jacquet's win over Dimitrov (1919).
Rest▸ Jacquet●●●
Both played yesterday, but Daniel has 7 matches in 14 days versus Jacquet's 2, raising Daniel's fatigue risk.
Serve/return▸ Daniel●●
Daniel's 45% return rate beats Jacquet's 38%, threatening to offset Jacquet's 67% serve-points-won edge over Daniel's 64%.
LEVEL AND RANKING

Jacquet holds a clear structural edge: an Elo rating of 1894 against Daniel's 1842, a better world ranking (139 vs 168), and a rising trend (+8) while Daniel's is flat. This gap is the backbone of the model's 56% probability for Jacquet, and it aligns closely with the market's own 55% implied read, suggesting the ranking and rating differential is already well priced in rather than a hidden edge.

HISTORY AND CURRENT FORM

Jacquet has won both previous meetings, including a 2025 ATP match, giving him a psychological edge, though a two-match sample is too small to lean on heavily. Current form tells a more mixed story: Daniel is 8-2 in his last 10 versus Jacquet's 7-3, and his quality win over Z. Piros (Elo 1932) is more impressive on paper than Jacquet's win over Dimitrov (Elo 1919), so recent momentum leans slightly toward Daniel even as the head-to-head favors Jacquet.

SCHEDULE FATIGUE

Both players are coming off a match played just one day ago, so short-term recovery is equal. The bigger separator is workload: Daniel has played 7 matches in the last 14 days compared to only 2 for Jacquet. That kind of match load can accumulate physically over a best-of-three or five-set battle, and it tilts the fatigue equation toward Jacquet having fresher legs.

SERVE-RETURN INTERPLAY

Jacquet wins slightly more service points (67% vs Daniel's 64%), which on its face is an advantage. But Daniel's return numbers are stronger too, 45% against Jacquet's 38%, meaning Daniel is comparatively better at neutralizing an opponent's serve than Jacquet is at handling return duty. That dynamic could blunt Jacquet's raw serve edge, making the serve-return battle closer to a wash than the individual serve numbers alone suggest.

VALUE READ

The model gives Jacquet 56% versus a market-implied 55% at odds of 1.82, producing a modest 2.4% expected value. This is not a strong signal — it reflects the model landing almost exactly where the market already sits, which is the expected outcome on average rather than evidence of mispricing.

Jacquet is the more likely winner based on rating, ranking trend, head-to-head record, and rest advantage, but Daniel's superior current form and stronger return game keep this competitive. Bettors should treat this as a fairly efficiently priced favorite rather than a clear value opportunity.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →