Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-19

B. Gadamauri vs A. Guillen Mezaprediction

Zug
✗ Missed
GADAMAURIWIN PROBABILITYMEZA
69%
Elo prob.
@1.90
odds · 53% impl.
🎾Serve 65%
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1845 vs 1707 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 289 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.45
fair odds
+30.9%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Gadamauri●●●
Elo gap (1845 vs 1707) backs a 69% model probability, well above the 53% market price — a clear rating edge for Gadamauri.
Serve/return▸ Gadamauri●●
Gadamauri wins 65% of serve points vs Guillen Meza's 60%, while return numbers are nearly even (37% vs 38%), so the serve gap is the differentiator.
Form▸ Gadamauri●●
Guillen Meza is on a 4-match losing streak (LLWLLWLLLL), suggesting fragile confidence heading into this match.
Rest= Even
Guillen Meza had 5 days off and only 2 matches in 14 days — no fatigue disadvantage visible in the data.
LEVEL GAP

The Elo differential (1845 for Gadamauri vs 1707 for Guillen Meza) is the foundation of this line, translating into a 69% model probability for the favorite — 16 points above the 53% implied by the market price. That gap, built on Challenger-level rating history, is the single biggest driver of the outlook.

SERVE EDGE

Gadamauri's 65% serve-points-won rate outpaces Guillen Meza's 60%, a five-point gap that should let him hold more comfortably over the match. Return numbers are almost identical (37% vs 38%), so neither player figures to break serve at a materially higher rate — the edge in this match comes mainly from service hold, not return pressure.

FORM SLUMP

Guillen Meza's last ten results read LLWLLWLLLL, a four-match losing streak with no quality wins listed. That kind of run points to a player struggling to find rhythm, which adds context — though not a hard number — to why the model leans toward Gadamauri beyond the pure rating gap.

VALUE CHECK

The listed edge (69% model vs 53% market, for an EV of about 31%) looks large, but this comes from a soft Challenger/ITF Elo estimate, not a fully priced, liquid market — the method itself flags this edge as unproven live. Being the favorite here does not equate to being undervalued by a reliable margin; treat the number as a rough estimate rather than a confirmed opportunity, and size any interest accordingly.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →