ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-18

T. McCormick vs J. Gainesprediction

M15 Rochester, NY
✓ Correct
MCCORMICKWIN PROBABILITYGAINES
55%
Elo prob.
@1.57
odds · 64% impl.
📈Form 5/10 · 3✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1536 vs 1503 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 228 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.82
fair odds
−14.0%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ McCormick●●●
McCormick's 1536 Elo tops Gaines' 1503, feeding a 55% model win probability — a modest but real ratings edge.
Rest▸ Gaines
McCormick played 4 matches in 14 days vs Gaines' 3; extra accumulated load slightly favors the fresher Gaines.
Form= Even
Both are 5-5 over their last 10 with identical 3-match win streaks — no form edge either way.
Fatigue= Even
Both reached the QF at this same M15 Rochester event just 1 day ago, so deep-run fatigue applies equally.
Market value= Even●●●
Odds of 1.59 imply 63% for McCormick, well above the model's 55%; EV is -12.9%, no edge here.
RATING EDGE

McCormick's Elo advantage (1536 vs 1503) is the clearest signal in this match, translating to a 55% model probability of victory. That gap is real but not large — roughly the difference you'd expect between a player ranked a tier above another in a thin ITF field, not a mismatch.

FORM AND FATIGUE WASH OUT

Recent form offers no tiebreaker: both players sit at 5-5 over their last 10 matches and both are riding 3-match win streaks. Whatever momentum each carries into this match is symmetric.

Fatigue is similarly balanced. Both McCormick and Gaines reached the quarterfinals of this same M15 Rochester event just one day ago, so any physical toll from a deep run applies to both sides equally and shouldn't be read as an edge for either.

REST LOAD

The one asymmetry worth flagging is workload: McCormick has played 4 matches in the last 14 days against Gaines' 3. Both had a single day off before this match, but the extra match on McCormick's ledger is a small mark in Gaines' favor heading into a potential third set.

HONEST VALUE READ

The market prices McCormick at 63% implied probability (odds of 1.59), while the model — built on a soft Challenger/ITF Elo dataset — puts him at 55%. That gap produces a -12.9% expected value, meaning this is not a value bet by the model's own numbers.

McCormick is the more likely winner on rating alone, but 'favorite' here does not mean 'backable price.' In a soft, thinly-tracked ITF market, treat the Elo edge as a probability estimate rather than a proven mispricing, and recognize that the market is already asking a premium the model doesn't support.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →