ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-18

S. Cuenin vs D. Jadeprediction

M25 Uriage
✓ Correct
CUENINWIN PROBABILITYJADE
76%
Elo prob.
@1.40
odds · 71% impl.
📈Form 9/10 · 6✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1774 vs 1571 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 187 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.31
fair odds
+6.7%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Cuenin●●●
Elo gap (1774 vs 1571) drives the 76% model probability, above the market's 71% implied read.
Form▸ Cuenin●●
Cuenin's 6-match win streak (WWWLWWWWWW) edges Jade's 3-match run (WWWWWWLWWW), a small momentum tilt.
Rest= Even
Both played 1 day ago with 3 matches in the last 14 days — identical recovery load, no edge either way.
Deep-run fatigue= Even
Both reached the same M25 Uriage quarterfinal 1 day ago, so any fatigue effect applies equally to each player.
Value▸ Cuenin●●
Model's 76% vs market's 71% implied gives a 6.7% EV at 1.40 odds, but this is a soft ITF Elo market — edge unproven.
ELO GAP

The core driver of this line is the rating gap: Cuenin sits at 1774 Elo against Jade's 1571, a 203-point difference that translates into the model's 76% favorite probability. That is a meaningful separation for the Challenger/ITF level, where such a gap usually reflects a real difference in match-winning consistency rather than a single hot streak.

No surface, serve, or return data is available for this match, so the rating differential is effectively the whole story here — there is no secondary signal (serve dominance, surface fit) to either reinforce or contradict it.

FORM SNAPSHOT

Both players arrive in good form: Cuenin has won 9 of his last 10 with a current 6-match streak, while Jade has won 9 of 10 as well but with a shorter 3-match streak and a more recent loss inside that window. The edge is marginal — both are clearly playing well — but Cuenin's longer active streak points to slightly more consistent recent execution.

Neither player has recorded a quality win in the data provided, so this form read is based purely on results volume, not opposition strength.

RECOVERY EVEN

Rest and workload are a wash: both players last competed 1 day ago and have each played 3 matches in the past 14 days. Whatever fatigue accumulates from a busy stretch at this event, it applies symmetrically, so it shouldn't tilt the match either direction.

Both are also flagged for reaching the same quarterfinal round at M25 Uriage a day before this match, reinforcing that any physical toll is shared rather than a differentiator.

VALUE CHECK

The model prices Cuenin at 76% against a market-implied 71% (odds of 1.40), producing a 6.7% expected-value edge. That gap is driven entirely by the Elo differential, since no surface or serve/return inputs are available to corroborate it.

This is worth treating cautiously: the method here is a soft Challenger/ITF Elo estimate, and edges in this tier are not validated the way they are on the main tour. Favorite status and model probability are not proof of value — being ahead of the market by a few points is a real but unproven signal, not a guaranteed opportunity.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →