ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-17

T. Legout vs A. Frusinaprediction

M25 Louisville, KY
✓ Correct
LEGOUTWIN PROBABILITYFRUSINA
81%
Elo prob.
@1.16
odds · 86% impl.
🎾Serve 68%📈Form 8/10 · 2✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1727 vs 1474 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 161 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.23
fair odds
−6.0%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Legout●●●
Elo gap of 253 points (1727 vs 1474) gives Legout an 81% model probability, well above Frusina's rating tier.
Serve/return▸ Legout●●
Legout wins 68% of service points and 44% on return — a well-rounded profile with no comparable data available for Frusina.
Form▸ Legout
Legout is 7-3 over his last 10 with a 2-match win streak, slightly ahead of Frusina's 6-4 and single-match streak.
Rest▸ Frusina●●
Legout has played 9 matches in 14 days versus Frusina's 4 — more accumulated load could show up in a physical, multi-set battle.
Market Value= Even
At 1.15 odds the market implies 87% versus the model's 81%, producing a -6.8% expected value — no edge here.
RATING GAP

The core signal in this match is the Elo differential: 1727 for Legout against 1474 for Frusina, a gap of 253 points that translates into an 81% win probability for the favorite. This is a soft ITF market, so the number should be read as a reasonable estimate rather than a precise edge, but the scale of the gap is large enough to be meaningful on its own.

Legout's serve and return numbers (68% and 44%) reinforce that gap — both are solid marks that suggest a player who can control points from either side. No equivalent data exists for Frusina, so the comparison leans entirely on what we know about the favorite's game, not on a documented weakness in the opponent.

FORM AND FATIGUE

Recent form slightly favors Legout, who is 7-3 in his last 10 matches with a 2-match winning streak, compared to Frusina's 6-4 record and a single-match streak. The gap is modest and shouldn't be treated as a major separating factor on its own.

Workload tells a different story: Legout has played 9 matches in the last 14 days against just 4 for Frusina. That kind of schedule congestion can erode movement and serve power late in a match, especially if this contest stretches into a third set — a factor that works against the favorite even as his underlying level remains higher.

VALUE READ

The model puts Legout's win probability at 81%, while the market — priced at 1.15 odds — implies 87%. That gap produces a negative expected value of -6.8%, meaning the price is already tighter than what the data supports. Legout being the clear favorite does not mean backing him at this price is good value; on this number, it is not.

This is also an Elo-based estimate in a Challenger/ITF context, where the market itself is thinner and less scrutinized than tour-level markets. Combined with Legout's heavier recent workload, the case here is for caution rather than confidence: the favorite is likely to win more often than not, but the market is already pricing that in and then some.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →