Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-17

A. Holmgren vs J. Boulaisprediction

Granby
✓ Correct
HOLMGRENWIN PROBABILITYBOULAIS
61%
Elo prob.
@1.45
odds · 69% impl.
🎾Serve 66%📈Form 5/10 · 2✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1782 vs 1705 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 285 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.64
fair odds
−11.6%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Holmgren●●●
Elo gap of 77 points (1782 vs 1705) gives Holmgren a 61% model win probability; he's ranked 178th, Boulais unranked.
Serve/return▸ Boulais●●
Both hold serve at 66%, canceling that battle, but Boulais returns better (37% vs 34%), a slight edge on return points.
Form▸ Holmgren
Holmgren's last 10 is 5-5 versus Boulais' 4-6, though both are riding 2-match win streaks right now.
Rest▸ Holmgren
Both had 2 days off, but Boulais played 4 matches in the last 14 days versus 3 for Holmgren, slightly more accumulated load.
ELO GAP

The core edge here is rating: Holmgren's 1782 Elo sits 77 points above Boulais' 1705, translating to a 61% model win probability. That gap is real but modest for a Challenger match, especially with no ranking data available for Boulais to cross-check the read.

This is not a mismatch — it's a moderate favorite in a soft, thinly-analyzed market segment where Elo itself carries more uncertainty than on the main tour.

SERVE VS RETURN BALANCE

On serve, the two players are identical at 66% points won, so neither gains ground holding serve. The differentiator is on return: Boulais wins 37% of return points against Holmgren's 34%, a three-point edge that suggests he breaks or pressures serve slightly more often in this specific matchup.

That return edge works against the favorite's profile and is worth watching — it's the one concrete stat here that cuts toward Boulais rather than reinforcing the Elo-based favoritism.

FORM AND FATIGUE

Both players enter on 2-match winning streaks, but the broader ten-match sample favors Holmgren (5-5) over Boulais (4-6). Neither trend is dominant, so this is a mild tailwind for the favorite rather than a decisive signal.

Rest is essentially even — both had 2 days since their last match — but Boulais has played one more match in the past two weeks (4 vs 3), a small additional load that could matter marginally in a tight contest.

VALUE READ

The model gives Holmgren 61%, while the market prices him at 69% (odds 1.45), producing a -11.6% expected value. That gap means the market is more confident in the favorite than this model is — backing him at these odds is not supported by the numbers here.

Remember this comes from a Challenger-tier Elo estimate, a softer market where edges are unproven even when they appear. Being the favorite is not the same as being a value bet, and on this data, it isn't one.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →