ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-16

V. Durasovic vs A. Bonnaudprediction

M25 Uriage
DURASOVICWIN PROBABILITYBONNAUD
76%
Elo prob.
@1.15
odds · 87% impl.
🎾Serve 57%📈Form 4/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1629 vs 1425 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 350 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.31
fair odds
−12.2%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Durasovic●●●
Elo gap (1629 vs 1425) gives Durasovic a 76% model edge, yet the market prices him even higher at 87%.
Form▸ Durasovic●●
Durasovic's 4-6 last10 record tops Bonnaud's 2-8, pointing to a steadier recent trend for the favorite.
Rest▸ Bonnaud
Durasovic logged 3 matches in 14 days versus Bonnaud's 2, adding modest fatigue risk despite identical one-day rest.
Serve/return▸ Durasovic●●
Durasovic's own 57% serve and 28% return marks show a serve-heavy profile; no comparable Bonnaud numbers exist to weigh against.
Value= Even●●●
Odds imply 87% win probability while the model gives 76%, yielding a -12.2% EV: no backing value here.
LEVEL GAP

The Elo differential of 1629 to 1425 is the clearest signal in this match, translating to a 76% model probability for Durasovic. That gap reflects a meaningful quality difference at this ITF level, built over a track record of 350 matches for the favorite.

Still, the market is more confident than the model, pricing Durasovic at 87% implied probability. That divergence matters: when the market outruns a rating-based estimate this much, it usually means the market is pricing in factors the Elo number doesn't capture, or simply overshooting on a short-priced favorite.

FORM AND SCHEDULE

Recent form tilts toward Durasovic, who has won 4 of his last 10 matches compared to Bonnaud's 2 of 10. Neither player is in red-hot form, but Durasovic's record shows a marginally more balanced run into this contest.

Schedule congestion works slightly against Durasovic, who has played 3 matches in the last 14 days versus Bonnaud's 2, even though both come in on a single day of rest. That extra match load is a minor accumulation-of-fatigue risk that could show up in a tight third set.

SERVE PROFILE

Durasovic's own numbers — a 57% serve-points-won rate and 28% on return — describe a player who leans on his serve to control points. Without a matching return or serve figure for Bonnaud, it's not possible to quantify how that serve strength converts into an edge on this specific matchup, but the raw rate itself is a solid baseline for a player at this level.

VALUE READ

Being the favorite is not the same as being a good bet. Here, the model's 76% probability is meaningfully below the market's 87% implied probability at odds of 1.15, producing a -12.2% expected value. That means, on average, backing Durasovic at this price would be expected to lose money over time.

This is also a soft-market Elo estimate at the Challenger/ITF level, where any edge is inherently harder to trust than in a fully modeled ATP match. Treat the -12.2% EV as a signal to pass rather than an exploitable opportunity, especially given how thin the surrounding data (no surface, ranking, or opponent serve/return numbers) is for this specific matchup.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →