ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-16

Ja. Delaney vs C. Fergusonprediction

M25 Brisbane
✓ Correct
DELANEYWIN PROBABILITYFERGUSON
53%
Elo prob.
@1.32
odds · 76% impl.
Rest 1d vs 2d🎾Serve 53%📈Form 6/10 · 2✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1611 vs 1590 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 401 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.89
fair odds
−30.1%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Delaney●●
Delaney's 1611 Elo vs Ferguson's 1590 supports the model's 53%-47% split, a modest but real edge.
Form▸ Delaney
Delaney's last 10 (6 wins) edges Ferguson's (5 wins), though both are on a 2-match win streak.
Rest▸ Ferguson●●
Ferguson has 2 days rest vs Delaney's 1, and played one fewer match in the last 14 days (3 vs 4), leaving him fresher.
Serve/return= Even
Delaney serves at 53% and returns at 43%, but no comparable numbers exist for Ferguson to judge the matchup.
Market value▸ Ferguson●●●
Odds of 1.32 imply 76% for Delaney, far above the model's 53%; expected value is -30.1%, a poor price regardless of who wins.
LEVEL AND FORM

Delaney's Elo advantage (1611 vs 1590) is the clearest structural edge in this match, translating into the model's 53%-47% favorite split. It's a real but narrow gap — not the kind of rating separation that suggests a lopsided contest.

Recent form adds a small supporting layer: Delaney is 6-4 in his last 10 matches compared to Ferguson's 5-5, though both players enter on identical 2-match winning streaks. This modestly reinforces the Elo-based lean toward Delaney rather than offering an independent signal.

REST AND SCHEDULE

Ferguson holds a slight physical edge here. He has had 2 days since his last match versus Delaney's 1, and has played one fewer match in the past two weeks (3 vs 4). Over a best-of-three ITF match this is a minor factor, but it works against the extra fatigue Delaney is carrying into this contest.

This doesn't overturn the rating gap, but it tempers it: Delaney is favored to be the better player over time, while Ferguson may be the fresher one on this specific day.

SERVE PATTERNS

The data shows Delaney winning 53% of his service points and 43% of his return points, indicating a game built more around holding serve than breaking. However, no equivalent serve or return numbers are available for Ferguson, so this factor can't be turned into a direct comparative edge — it simply describes one side of the match.

VALUE READ

Being the favorite here does not mean this is a good bet. The model gives Delaney only 53% to win, but the market — via odds of 1.32 — implies a much higher 76% chance. That gap produces a expected value of -30.1%, a clearly unfavorable price even under a small edge in Elo and rest disadvantage for Delaney.

This is also an Elo-based Challenger/ITF estimate, a softer, less-scrutinized market than tour-level modeling. Treat the projected edge as informational rather than actionable — the numbers here argue for caution, not confidence, in backing the favorite at this price.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →