ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-15

D. N. Cazacu vs E. Villosladaprediction

M15 Slobozia
✓ Correct
CAZACUWIN PROBABILITYVILLOSLADA
67%
Elo prob.
@1.11
odds · 90% impl.
🎾Serve 58%📈Form 3/10 · 3✗
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1487 vs 1368 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 163 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.50
fair odds
−26.1%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Cazacu●●●
Elo gap (1487 vs 1368) gives Cazacu a 67% model probability, well below the market's 90% implied price.
Form▸ Villoslada
Villoslada is on a 1-match win streak while Cazacu has lost his last three, suggesting slightly better current momentum for the opponent.
Rest= Even
Both players had 10 days off, but Villoslada logged 2 matches in the last 14 days versus Cazacu's 1, giving him marginally more match rhythm.
Serve/return▸ Cazacu●●
Cazacu's 58% serve-points-won rate is a real weapon; no comparable data exists for Villoslada, so the edge is one-sided but unverified against the opponent.
Value▸ Villoslada●●●
At 1.11 odds the market prices a 90% win chance for Cazacu, far above the model's 67%, producing a -26.1% expected value.
LEVEL GAP

The Elo difference (1487 for Cazacu vs 1368 for Villoslada) is the clearest structural edge in this match, translating into a 67% model win probability for the favorite. That gap reflects a meaningful quality difference in ITF-level competition, but it's worth noting the market prices Cazacu even higher, at 90% implied, which is a much larger gap than the rating system supports.

FORM AND MOMENTUM

Recent form is close to a wash statistically — both players have won 3 of their last 10 matches — but the trend lines diverge. Cazacu arrives on a 3-match losing streak, while Villoslada has a 1-match winning streak. Neither run is dominant, but the direction of travel slightly favors the opponent heading into this contest.

SERVE STRENGTH

Cazacu's tracked numbers show a 58% serve-points-won rate, a solid baseline for controlling service games at this level. There is no equivalent serve or return data for Villoslada, so this factor can only be read as a standalone strength for Cazacu rather than a direct comparative advantage.

SCHEDULE LOAD

Both players had identical 10-day rest windows, removing fatigue as a differentiating factor in the traditional sense. However, Villoslada played two matches in the last 14 days against Cazacu's one, which could mean slightly sharper timing for the opponent, though the gap is too small to weigh heavily.

VALUE READ

The model favors Cazacu at 67%, but the market is pricing him at a 90% implied probability via 1.11 odds — a substantial disconnect that produces a -26.1% expected value. Even accounting for the softness of Challenger/ITF Elo markets, where edges are less proven, this gap suggests the price offers no value for backing the favorite. Being the projected winner is not the same as being a good bet here: on this data, the honest read is to treat Cazacu as likely to win but priced well beyond what the numbers justify.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →