Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-14

G. Onclin vs T. Boogaardprediction

Bunschoten
ONCLINWIN PROBABILITYBOOGAARD
75%
Elo prob.
@1.25
odds · 80% impl.
Rest 5d vs 23d🎾Serve 63%📈Form 5/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1842 vs 1651 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 365 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.33
fair odds
−6.3%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Onclin●●●
Elo edge (1842 vs 1651) and ranking gap (186 vs 779) reflect a clear class difference favoring Onclin.
Serve/return▸ Onclin●●
Both serve at 63%, but Onclin's 38% return rate outpaces Boogaard's 31%, giving him the edge on return points.
Form▸ Boogaard●●
Boogaard is riding a 5-match win streak (WWLWLWWWWW) while Onclin has lost 6 of his last 10 (LWWWLLWLWL).
Rest▸ Boogaard
Boogaard enters fresh after 23 days off with no recent matches, while Onclin played 5 days ago, twice in 14 days.
Ranking trend▸ Boogaard
Boogaard's ranking has surged by 269 spots recently, far outpacing Onclin's 53-spot climb, signaling faster improvement.
Market value= Even●●
The market prices Onclin at 80% implied probability versus the model's 75%, producing a negative 6.3% expected value.
CLASS GAP

Onclin's Elo rating of 1842 sits 191 points above Boogaard's 1651, and the ranking table tells the same story: No. 186 versus No. 779. This is a Challenger match between a player with established tour standing and one ranked deep in the lower tiers, and the model's 75% probability for Onclin largely reflects that structural gap.

SERVE AND RETURN

Both players hold serve at an identical 63% rate, so neither has a clear advantage when serving. The separation shows up on return: Onclin wins 38% of return points against Boogaard's 31%, a 7-point edge suggesting he is the more effective returner and likely to generate more break opportunities over the course of the match.

FORM AND MOMENTUM

The recent form line runs counter to the class gap. Boogaard has won five straight and eight of his last ten (WWLWLWWWWW), while Onclin is 4-6 over the same span and currently on a one-match losing streak (LWWWLLWLWL). Boogaard's ranking has also climbed 269 places recently versus Onclin's 53, and he arrives with 23 days of rest against Onclin's five days off and two matches played in the last two weeks — all pointing to a fresher, in-form challenger, even though the underlying quality gap remains sizable.

VALUE READ

The sportsbook prices Onclin at an implied 80% (odds of 1.25), while the Elo model puts him at 75% — a gap that produces a -6.3% expected value on the favorite. Being favored is not the same as offering value here: the market is already pricing Onclin slightly higher than the model justifies, and this is a soft Challenger/ITF market where the model's edge is not proven live. Based on these numbers, there is no indicated betting value on either side at the current odds.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →