MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-07-14
CLAY

D. Altmaier vs H. Gastonprediction

Bastad
ALTMAIERWIN PROBABILITYGASTON
64%
model prob.
@1.60
odds · 63% impl.
H2H 0–1 AltmaierRest 13d vs 2d🎾Serve 62%📈Form 5/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Clay

Slow court, high bounce: longer points, rewards whoever holds up from the baseline.

Temperature
25°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
55%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind
11 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #61 vs #118 (better ranked)

Recent form: 5/10 in recent matches

Head-to-head: 0-1 against

WATCH FOR

!Unfavorable head-to-head record (0-1)

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.57
fair odds
+1.6%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Rest▸ Altmaier●●●
Altmaier has had 13 days off while Gaston played 5 matches in 14 days and reached the Braunschweig final just 2 days ago.
Serve/return▸ Gaston●●
Gaston's 41% return points won beats Altmaier's 33% by 8 points, a larger gap than Altmaier's 4-point serve edge (66% vs 62%).
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Altmaier●●
Altmaier sits at Nr. 61 (Elo 1863) versus Gaston's Nr. 118 (Elo 1833), a modest but real 30-point Elo gap.
Head-to-head▸ Gaston
Gaston won their only prior meeting in 2024, though the sample is limited to a single match.
Form= Even
Gaston is 7-3 in his last 10 versus Altmaier's 5-5, but Altmaier's wins over Medvedev (Elo 2048) and Shelton (Elo 2032) carry more weight than Gaston's best, Diaz Acosta (Elo 1925).
Baseline model▸ Altmaier●●
The model's baseline win rate gives Altmaier 41% versus Gaston's 25%, a 16-point gap reflecting overall level before situational adjustments.
FATIGUE EDGE

The clearest, most concrete edge in this match is physical: Altmaier arrives with 13 days of rest and just one match in the last two weeks, while Gaston has played five matches in fourteen days and reached the Braunschweig final only two days ago. That kind of workload, especially a deep run ending in a final, typically shows up as slower movement and diminished return quality in the very next match — which directly undercuts the one area (return points won) where Gaston currently holds a numerical edge.

This is a context flag rather than a hard percentage, but it's consistent and unambiguous in direction: everything about the schedule points toward Altmaier having the fresher legs on court.

SERVE-RETURN CROSSCURRENTS

The serve and return numbers don't point the same way. Altmaier is the better server on paper (66% vs 62%), but Gaston is the better returner by a wider margin (41% vs 33%). Since the return gap (8 points) exceeds the serve gap (4 points), the raw numbers alone would suggest Gaston has slightly more break-point currency in open play.

This is exactly where the fatigue question matters: a return game built on quick reactions and clean footwork — like Gaston's 41% return rate — is the first thing to erode after a five-match, two-week stretch. So while the numbers alone give Gaston a puncher's chance on return, the schedule context works against him sustaining it.

FORM, HISTORY & LEVEL

Gaston has the better recent scoreline (7-3 in his last 10 vs Altmaier's 5-5) and did win their only previous meeting back in 2024, though that's a single data point and not much to lean on. Altmaier's counterweight is quality: wins over Medvedev (Elo 2048) and Shelton (Elo 2032) are a tier above Gaston's best result, a win over Diaz Acosta (Elo 1925).

The ranking and Elo gap reinforces this: Altmaier is Nr. 61 with a 1863 Elo against Gaston's Nr. 118 and 1833 Elo. It's not a large gap — about 30 Elo points — but combined with the model's baseline split of 41% to 25%, it points to Altmaier as the generally stronger player independent of this specific matchup's serve/return crosscurrents.

VALUE READ

The model puts Altmaier at 64% to win, against a market-implied probability of 63% at odds of 1.60. The gap is thin — about 1.6% expected value — which means this is close to a fair-priced favorite rather than a mispriced one. Being the favorite here is not the same as holding value; the market has already priced in most of what the data shows, including the rest disparity and the level gap.

On balance, Altmaier looks like the more likely winner on both rest and overall level, while Gaston's return numbers and recent win rate offer a plausible, if fatigue-compromised, path to an upset. Given the near-parity between model and market, this is a case for modest confidence in the favorite rather than a strong betting edge.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →