You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

W. K. Leong M. vs B. Munk Mesa — prediction

Pozoblanco
M.WIN PROBABILITYMESA
70%
Elo prob.
@1.37
odds · 73% impl.
📈Form 6/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1628 vs 1482 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 208 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.43
fair odds
−4.2%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ M.●●●
Elo rates the favorite well above the opponent, 1628 vs 1482, a 146-point gap signaling a clear quality edge.
Form▸ M.
Last 10 matches show 6 wins for the favorite (WLWLWWWLLW) vs 5 for the opponent (WLWLWLLWLW), a marginal recent edge.
Rest▸ Mesa
Favorite played 2 matches in the last 14 days vs the opponent's 1, adding slightly more accumulated fatigue for him.
Deep-run fatigue= Even
Both reached the same Pozoblanco semifinal just 1 day ago, so the fatigue effect cancels out between them.
Market value= Even●●●
Odds of 1.34 imply a 75% win chance, above the model's 70% estimate, producing a -6.3% expected value.
ELO GAP

The 146-point Elo gap (1628 vs 1482) is the clearest signal in this match, and it's the main reason the favorite is priced ahead. In Challenger tennis, a gap this size typically reflects a real difference in consistency and point-winning ability over a large sample, here built on 208 tracked matches for the favorite.

Still, this is a soft market by the model's own labeling — Elo-based Challenger/ITF estimates are less rigorously tested than the ATP tour model, so the 70% probability should be treated as a reasonable but unproven read rather than a hard number.

FORM & SCHEDULE

Recent form offers only a marginal tilt toward the favorite: 6 wins in his last 10 (WLWLWWWLLW) versus 5 for the opponent (WLWLWLLWLW), with both currently on a 1-match win streak. This is not a differentiating factor on its own.

Schedule load slightly favors the opponent — he's played only 1 match in the last 14 days against the favorite's 2 — but both men reached the same Pozoblanco semifinal just a day ago, so the deep-run fatigue effect is essentially symmetric and doesn't add a meaningful edge either way.

VALUE READ

The model's 70% win probability for the favorite sits below the market's implied 75% (from odds of 1.34), producing a negative expected value of -6.3%. That means the price is asking for more confidence in the favorite than the model itself supports.

Being favored is not the same as offering value here — with no surface, serve/return, or head-to-head data available to sharpen the picture, the case rests mainly on the Elo gap, and that alone doesn't clear the market's asking price. On the numbers given, this is a pass rather than a backable edge.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →