You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

K. Miyoshi vs K. Poling — prediction

Granby
MIYOSHIWIN PROBABILITYPOLING
63%
Elo prob.
@1.28
odds · 78% impl.
H2H 1–0 Miyoshi📈Form 8/10 · 6✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1678 vs 1584 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 98 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.58
fair odds
−19.2%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Miyoshi●●●
Miyoshi's 1678 Elo sits 94 points above Poling's 1584, the clearest quality gap in this match.
Form▸ Miyoshi●●
Miyoshi is riding a 6-match win streak (WLWLWWWWWW) versus Poling's uneven WWLWLLWWLW with a 1-match streak.
Head-to-head▸ Miyoshi
Miyoshi won their only prior meeting in 2026, though a single match is a thin sample.
Rest▸ Poling●●
Both played 1 day ago, but Miyoshi has logged 6 matches in 14 days versus Poling's 4, adding more cumulative load.
Serve/return= Even
Poling's serve (55%) outpaces his return (43%) by 12 points, showing a serve-reliant profile, but no comparable data exists for Miyoshi.
Value▸ Poling●●●
Model gives Miyoshi 63% but the market prices 79% (odds 1.26), producing a -20.5% EV — no edge here.
ELO GAP

The 94-point Elo difference (1678 vs 1584) is the strongest signal in this dataset and reflects a genuine quality gap in the Challenger/ITF pool. This isn't a razor-thin matchup by rating terms, and it's consistent with Miyoshi being priced as the clear favorite.

Still, this is a soft-market Elo estimate rather than a fully validated ATP-level model, so the 63% probability should be read as an informed estimate, not a precise figure.

FORM AND MOMENTUM

Miyoshi's 6-match win streak and 8-2 record over his last 10 (WLWLWWWWWW) point to a player playing with confidence right now, and it aligns with his higher Elo. Poling, by contrast, has been inconsistent (WWLWLLWWLW) with just a 1-match streak, suggesting less rhythm entering this match.

The single head-to-head meeting — a Miyoshi win in 2026 — adds a small supporting data point, but with only one match played between them, it shouldn't be weighted heavily on its own.

WORKLOAD AND FATIGUE

Both players are working on 1 day of rest and both reached the Granby semifinals a day ago, so the immediate fatigue context is symmetric — neither has a scheduling advantage from recovery time alone.

Where they diverge is cumulative load: Miyoshi has played 6 matches in the last 14 days against Poling's 4. That extra volume is a mild factor working against Miyoshi physically, even though it hasn't dented his recent results yet.

VALUE READ

This is the key honest takeaway: the model's 63% for Miyoshi is meaningfully below the market's implied 79% at odds of 1.26, producing a -20.5% expected value. Being the favorite here does not mean this is a good bet — the market is pricing in more certainty than the model supports.

Given that Elo-based estimates in Challenger/ITF are inherently a softer, less-tested framework, there's no demonstrated edge to act on. The data supports Miyoshi as the likely winner, but not as a value proposition at this price.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →