You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
ATP · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

J. Kym vs D. Dietrich — prediction

KYMWIN PROBABILITYDIETRICH
66%
Elo prob.
@1.63
odds · 61% impl.
H2H 1–0 Kym🌡29° · 41% hum1050 m altitudeRest 2d vs 1d🎾Serve 66%
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1837 vs 1722 — favorite by rating

ATP qualifying / early round · 232 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): qualifying draws have no clean main-tour history

WATCH FOR

!Qualifying/soft context: Elo estimate only — read the round context (already-through, lucky loser, dead rubber) from the dossier; it is not a proven edge.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.52
fair odds
+7.6%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Kym●●●
Kym's 1837 Elo is 115 points above Dietrich's 1722, the model's clearest edge in this match.
Serve/return▸ Dietrich●●
Dietrich holds a slight edge on both ends: 68% serve vs Kym's 66%, and 38% return vs 37%.
Altitude▸ Dietrich
At 1050m the thinner air speeds up serves, a small boost to Dietrich, who already serves at 68% vs Kym's 66%.
Weather▸ Dietrich
Hot, dry conditions (30°C, 34% humidity) quicken the ball, marginally helping the better server, Dietrich at 68%.
Form= Even●●
Kym is 6-4 in his last 10 with a big win over Kokkinakis (Elo 1948), but sits on a 1-match losing streak; Dietrich is 7-3 with a 2-match win streak but no quality wins.
Head-to-head▸ Kym
Kym won the only prior meeting (2023, ITF level), a minor signal given the single data point.
Rest= Even
Kym has 2 days' rest but played 4 matches in 14 days vs Dietrich's 1 day rest and 3 matches — both carry recent workload, no clear edge.
ELO GAP

The 115-point Elo gap (1837 vs 1722) is the largest single signal in this match, and it lines up with the model's 66% probability for Kym. This is a Challenger/ITF-style soft-market Elo estimate, though, so the edge should be read as directional rather than precise.

SERVE VS RETURN

The service numbers actually tilt slightly toward Dietrich, who serves at 68% against Kym's 66%, and also returns marginally better (38% vs 37%). This is a rare case where the Elo favorite does not hold the raw serve/return advantage, meaning Kym's edge is coming more from broader match quality than from a clear stroke-for-stroke mismatch.

The altitude (1050m) and hot, dry weather (30°C, 34% humidity) both tend to speed up the ball and reward the better server on the day — a small tailwind for Dietrich given his 68% serve mark, though not enough to offset the Elo gap on its own.

FORM SIGNALS

Kym's last 10 (6-4) includes a notable win over Kokkinakis (Elo 1948), but he arrives on a one-match losing streak. Dietrich is in better run-form on paper (7-3, a 2-match win streak) but without a listed quality win. These are offsetting signals rather than a clear edge for either side.

CONTEXT FLAGS

Both players carry deep-run fatigue: Kym reached the semifinals at Iasi two days ago, while Dietrich reached the final at this same Gstaad event just one day ago. Neither profile suggests a rest advantage; if anything Dietrich's turnaround is tighter, but this is context, not a quantified factor.

VALUE READ

The model gives Kym 66% against a market-implied 60% (odds 1.67), producing a modeled EV of 10.2%. That is a real but modest gap, and it comes from a Challenger/ITF-style Elo method where the market itself is thin and the model's edge over it is unproven. Kym is the more likely winner on the numbers, but the serve/return split favoring Dietrich and the soft nature of this Elo estimate mean this should be treated as a small, uncertain edge — not a confident value bet.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →