You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

H. Grenier vs C. Vandermeersch — prediction

Pozoblanco
GRENIERWIN PROBABILITYVANDERMEERSCH
57%
Elo prob.
@1.42
odds · 70% impl.
Rest 11d vs 6d🎾Serve 62%📈Form 1/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1699 vs 1650 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 348 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.76
fair odds
−19.2%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Grenier●●
Grenier's 1699 Elo is 49 points above Vandermeersch's 1650, a modest but real ratings edge for the favorite.
Form▸ Vandermeersch●●●
Grenier has won just 1 of his last 10 (LLLLLLLLWL); Vandermeersch won 7 of 10 despite a current 2-match slide.
Rest▸ Grenier
Grenier has had 11 days to recover vs Vandermeersch's 6, though Grenier also played more recently (2 matches in 14 days vs 1).
Serve/return▸ Grenier
Grenier's 62% service points won is a solid number, but no comparable figure exists for Vandermeersch to weigh it against.
Value= Even●●●
Market implies 70% for Grenier vs the model's 57%, producing a -19.2% EV — the price is not supported by the data here.
ELO GAP AND SOFT MARKET

Grenier holds a 1699-to-1650 Elo edge over Vandermeersch, a real but not overwhelming gap of 49 points that puts him ahead on pure rating. This is a Challenger-level Elo estimate, however, built on a thinner, less scrutinized dataset than the ATP tour model, so the edge should be treated as a rough signal rather than a precise measurement.

The model converts this gap into a 57% win probability for Grenier — a lean, not a lock. With no surface, altitude, or head-to-head data available, the rating differential is one of the few hard anchors we have for this matchup.

FORM POINTS THE OTHER WAY

The recent-form picture cuts against the Elo lean. Grenier has lost 9 of his last 10 matches (LLLLLLLLWL), a rough stretch that raises real questions about his current level regardless of where his rating sits. Vandermeersch, by contrast, won 7 of his last 10 (WWWWWLWWLL), even though he arrives on a 2-match losing streak of his own.

Momentum and rating are pulling in opposite directions here: Grenier is favored by the numbers, but Vandermeersch is the one who has actually been winning matches more recently. That tension is a central reason the model's edge for the favorite is limited to 57%, not something stronger.

REST AND SCHEDULE

Grenier arrives with 11 days of rest, compared to Vandermeersch's 6 days — a scheduling edge that could help freshness, particularly if the match extends into a third set. Grenier's slightly heavier recent workload (2 matches in the last 14 days versus Vandermeersch's 1) tempers that advantage somewhat, but the extra recovery time still leans in his favor.

SERVE DATA IS ONE-SIDED

Grenier's 62% of service points won is a strong number on its own terms, and his 31% return rate gives a partial read on his overall game style. But without any serve or return figures for Vandermeersch, this cannot be turned into a direct comparison — it simply confirms that Grenier has a functional service game, not that he holds an edge over his opponent in this specific department.

HONEST VALUE READ

The market prices Grenier at roughly 70% to win (odds of 1.42), while the model puts him at 57%. That 13-point gap translates into a -19.2% expected value on the favorite at this price — a clear signal that the market is more confident in Grenier than the data supports, once form and the modest Elo gap are weighed together.

This is a soft, Challenger-level market where pricing inefficiencies are plausible but unproven in practice. Grenier being the favorite does not equate to him being a value bet here; on the numbers given, backing him at 1.42 is not supported, and the case for the opponent's recent form adds to that caution.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →