You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

H. Barton vs J. Reis Da Silva — prediction

Bunschoten
BARTONWIN PROBABILITYSILVA
60%
Elo prob.
@1.45
odds · 69% impl.
Rest 6d vs 21d🎾Serve 63%📈Form 6/10 · 2✗
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1807 vs 1740 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 250 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.68
fair odds
−13.6%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Barton●●●
Barton's 1807 Elo sits 67 points above Reis Da Silva's 1740, the single largest gap in the data set.
Serve/return▸ Silva●●
Reis Da Silva serves at 67% vs Barton's 63%, giving him more free points; Barton's 36% return only partly offsets it.
Form▸ Barton●●
Barton is 6-4 over his last 10 (WWWLWWLWLL) vs Reis Da Silva's 4-6 (LLWLWLWWLL), despite both riding 2-match losing streaks.
Rest▸ Silva
Reis Da Silva has had 21 days off with no matches in two weeks, while Barton played 6 days ago — more recovery time for the opponent.
Odds value= Even●●●
Model gives Barton 60% but the market prices him at 71% (odds 1.41), producing a -16% expected value.
ELO GAP

The clearest signal here is the rating gap: Barton's 1807 Elo is 67 points clear of Reis Da Silva's 1740. In Challenger tennis that margin typically translates into a moderate but not overwhelming edge, which is exactly what the model reflects with a 60% win probability for the favorite rather than something more lopsided.

This is a soft-market Elo estimate, so it should be read as a reasonable baseline rather than a precise, market-tested figure. It sets the direction of the analysis but not the certainty.

SERVE VS RETURN

The serve and return numbers pull in different directions. Reis Da Silva's 67% serve-points-won is four points higher than Barton's 63%, meaning he is the more efficient server in this match-up and should have an easier time holding.

Barton compensates partially with a better return number, 36% versus Reis Da Silva's 34%. That two-point edge on return is real but smaller than the serve gap working against him, so on these two metrics alone the match-up is close to a wash, tilting marginally toward the opponent.

FORM AND MOMENTUM

Barton's longer-window form is stronger: 6 wins in his last 10 versus Reis Da Silva's 4. Both players are currently on 2-match losing streaks, so neither is arriving with positive short-term momentum, but Barton's baseline over the last 10 matches has simply been better.

This supports the Elo-based favoritism rather than contradicting it — the form data does not offer a reason to doubt the rating gap.

RECOVERY AND SCHEDULE

Reis Da Silva arrives with 21 days since his last match and zero matches in the past two weeks, compared to Barton's 6 days of rest and one recent match. In isolation, extra rest generally helps freshness, which gives the opponent a small physical edge here.

That said, a three-week gap without competition can also mean less recent match rhythm, though the data does not let us quantify that risk — it is simply a longer layoff than Barton's.

VALUE READ

The model's 60% probability for Barton translates to a fair price well above the market's implied 71% at odds of 1.41, producing a -16% expected value. In practical terms, the market is pricing Barton as a considerably stronger favorite than the Elo estimate supports.

Being the model's favorite is not the same as being a value bet. With a negative expected value and a soft, less-scrutinized Challenger market backing this estimate, there is no indication of an edge here — if anything, the price looks unfavorable relative to the model's own view.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →