You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

D. Milavsky vs D. Chan — prediction

Granby
MILAVSKYWIN PROBABILITYCHAN
64%
Elo prob.
@1.67
odds · 60% impl.
Rest 3d vs 4d🎾Serve 63%📈Form 6/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1676 vs 1573 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 115 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.55
fair odds
+7.5%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Milavsky●●●
Elo gap of 103 points (1676 vs 1573) makes Milavsky the rated favorite in this Challenger field.
Serve/return▸ Milavsky●●
Milavsky holds 63% of service points and wins 41% on return, a strong two-way profile; no comparable numbers exist for Chan.
Rest▸ Chan●●
Chan has played just 1 match in 14 days vs Milavsky's 5, giving him a clear fatigue advantage after a heavier schedule.
Form▸ Milavsky
Both are cooling, but Chan's two-match losing streak is steeper than Milavsky's single loss in his last 10.
Value/EV▸ Milavsky●●
Model sets Milavsky at 64% vs 61% market-implied, a 5.6% EV at 1.64 odds, though Challenger Elo edges remain unproven.
RATING AND STYLE EDGE

Milavsky's 103-point Elo advantage (1676 vs 1573) is the clearest signal in this match, reflecting a meaningfully stronger recent track record over Chan in comparable Challenger-level competition.

His serve and return numbers reinforce that gap: winning 63% of service points and 41% on return points shows a player who can both hold comfortably and pressure Chan's service games. No equivalent data exists for Chan, so this comparison rests on Milavsky's standalone profile rather than a head-to-head split.

FATIGUE FACTOR

Schedule load cuts against Milavsky here. He has played 5 matches in the last 14 days versus just 1 for Chan, and both players are working with similar rest (3 vs 4 days since their last match). That workload imbalance could blunt some of Milavsky's physical edge as the match progresses, even if his overall level remains higher on paper.

Chan's lighter schedule means he arrives fresher, which can matter in tighter, longer exchanges even if his underlying form and rating are behind.

MOMENTUM SIGNALS

Both players are in a mild downswing: Milavsky is 6-4 in his last 10 with a single-match losing streak, while Chan is 5-5 with back-to-back losses. Neither trend is dramatic, but Chan's two-match slide is the more pronounced of the two, giving a slight edge to Milavsky on recent momentum alone.

VALUE READ

The model prices Milavsky at 64% against a market-implied 61%, producing a modest 5.6% expected-value edge at 1.64 odds. That gap is real but small, and it comes from a soft Elo-based Challenger model rather than a fully validated market-beating system.

Being the favorite does not mean Milavsky is a lock: his rating edge is partly offset by the heavier recent workload, and Chan's fresher legs add uncertainty. Treat the EV figure as a modest estimate, not a confirmed opportunity, in line with the model's own caveat about soft Challenger markets.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →