You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

D. Glinka vs G. Johns — prediction

Granby
GLINKAWIN PROBABILITYJOHNS
61%
Elo prob.
@1.52
odds · 66% impl.
Rest 5d vs 4d🎾Serve 61%📈Form 3/10 · 2✗
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1730 vs 1652 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 313 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.64
fair odds
−7.3%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Glinka●●●
Glinka's Elo (1730) sits 78 points above Johns' (1652), the core basis for his 61% modeled win probability.
Serve/return▸ Johns●●
Both serve at 61%, but Johns returns 6 points better (37% vs 31%), giving him more break-point chances on Glinka's serve.
Form▸ Johns
Johns has 4 wins in his last 10 versus Glinka's 3, and a shorter losing streak (-1 vs -2), pointing to steadier recent form.
Rest▸ Glinka
Glinka has one extra rest day (5 vs 4) and one fewer match in the last 14 days (3 vs 4), a small fatigue edge.
Market value= Even●●●
Odds of 1.52 imply 66% for Glinka, above the model's 61%, yielding a -7.3% expected value — no edge here.
RATING GAP

Glinka's Elo rating of 1730 is 78 points higher than Johns' 1652, which is the foundation for his 61% modeled win probability. In Challenger tennis, a gap of this size reflects a real but moderate quality edge rather than a clear mismatch, particularly given how variable form can be at this level.

SERVE-RETURN MATCHUP

Both players hold serve at an identical 61%, which neutralizes that half of the equation entirely. The separating factor is on return: Johns returns at 37% compared to Glinka's 31%, a six-point edge that should let him convert more break opportunities against Glinka's serve than the reverse. This return disparity is the clearest technical factor working against the favorite in this matchup.

FORM AND SCHEDULE

Neither player arrives in strong form. Glinka has lost 7 of his last 10 matches and is on a two-match losing streak, while Johns has lost 6 of 10 with just a one-match skid — a marginal edge in consistency for Johns. Rest tilts slightly toward Glinka, who has had five days off compared to Johns' four, and has played one fewer match in the last two weeks (3 vs 4), a modest fatigue offset in the favorite's favor.

HONEST VALUE READ

At odds of 1.52, the market implies a 66% chance for Glinka, five points above the model's 61% estimate, producing a -7.3% expected value. Being the favorite here does not equate to value: the market is pricing in more certainty than the Elo-based model supports. Since this is a soft Challenger market built purely on Elo, with return numbers and form both leaning slightly toward Johns, the honest read is that this is a close match with no demonstrated betting edge, not an opportunity to back the favorite.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →