You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
Challenger · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-13

A. Gea vs F. Sun — prediction

Granby
GEAWIN PROBABILITYSUN
69%
Elo prob.
@1.21
odds · 83% impl.
Rest 3d vs 8d🎾Serve 64%📈Form 5/10
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1835 vs 1698 — favorite by rating

Challenger tier · 232 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.45
fair odds
−16.8%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo)▸ Gea●●●
Elo gap of 137 points (1835 vs 1698) shows a clear class difference, the single strongest signal in this match.
Form▸ Gea●●
Gea's last 10 (5-5, mixed) beats Sun's brutal 1-9 with a current 4-match losing streak, a real momentum gap.
Rest▸ Sun
Sun rested 8 days with only 2 matches in 14 days, while Gea played 3 in 14 on 3 days' rest — fatigue edge to Sun.
Serve/return▸ Gea●●
Gea holds serve at 64% and wins 37% on return, a strong two-way profile; no comparable data exists for Sun.
Ranking Trend▸ Gea
Gea's ranking trend of +33 spots signals recent improvement; no ranking or trend data exists for Sun to compare.
Market Value= Even●●●
Model gives Gea 69% but the market prices him at 83% (odds 1.21), producing a -16.8% EV — the price overpays for the favorite.
CLASS GAP

The 137-point Elo gap (1835 vs 1698) is the dominant factor in this match, reflecting a meaningful difference in overall level between the two players. Gea's ranking of 135 with a +33 trend adds a layer of corroboration, suggesting he's moving in the right direction, though no equivalent ranking data exists for Sun to confirm the gap's full size.

This is a Challenger-tier match, and the model flags itself as a softer, less-analyzed Elo estimate rather than a fully validated market factor. The class gap is real on paper, but the edge should be read as directional rather than precise.

FORM AND FRESHNESS

Recent form clearly favors Gea: a 5-5 record over his last 10 versus Sun's 1-9, with Sun currently on a 4-match losing streak. That kind of skid often compounds under match pressure, and there's no quality win in Sun's data to suggest he's turned a corner.

Rest cuts the other way. Sun has had 8 days since his last match and only 2 in the past 14, while Gea has played 3 matches in 14 days on just 3 days' rest. That workload could leave Gea slightly fresher-legged fatigue as a match wears on, a modest counterweight to his form and rating edge.

SERVE STRENGTH

Gea's own numbers, a 64% hold rate and 37% return-points-won, describe a player who controls service games and also creates chances on return. Both figures are solid at Challenger level, but they exist in isolation here since no serve or return data was logged for Sun.

Without comparable style numbers on Sun's side, it's not possible to say whether this specific split (aggressive server vs. reasonable returner) exploits or gets neutralized by Sun's particular tendencies. Treat this as a favorable but partial data point for Gea, not a full picture of the match up close.

VALUE CHECK

The model gives Gea a 69% win probability, but the market prices him at an implied 83% (odds of 1.21). That 14-point gap produces a -16.8% expected value on backing the favorite — the price is asking more confidence than the model itself holds.

Being the favorite here is not the same as being a value bet. The Elo method used is explicitly a soft Challenger/ITF estimate, meaning any edge is unproven and should be treated as an approximation rather than a firm signal. On the numbers presented, this looks like a match where Gea's overall level, form, and serve profile all point favorably, but the current market price offers no discount for backing him.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →