You're viewing data from 13 Jul — today's update hasn't been published yet.
MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-07-12

L. van Assche vs D. Lajovic — prediction

Result pending
ASSCHEWIN PROBABILITYLAJOVIC
58%
model prob.
@1.70
odds · 59% impl.
H2H 1–1 Assche🌡29° · 62% humRest 22d vs 12d🎾Serve 63%📈Form 7/10 · 5✓
THE MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #100 vs #138 (better ranked)

Recent form: 4/10 in recent matches

WATCH FOR

!Returning from a long layoff (45d) — possible rustiness

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.73
fair odds
−1.8%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Serve/return▸ Assche●●●
Equal serve (63% each) but van Assche returns far better: 47% vs 36%, an 11-point edge in return points won.
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Assche●●
Elo gap (1891 vs 1807) and ranking (#100 vs #138) with a +9 trend show a player moving up in class.
Form▸ Assche●●
Van Assche is 9-1 last 10 (5-match win streak) while Lajovic is 4-10 with back-to-back losses entering Umag.
Head-to-head= Even
Series tied 1-1; van Assche's only win came in 2025, but two meetings is too small to weigh heavily.
Rest▸ Lajovic
Lajovic played 12 days ago and once in last 14 days, giving him more recent match rhythm than van Assche's 22-day gap.
Weather= Even
Warm, humid conditions (29°C, 62% humidity) lengthen rallies, but with both servers at 63% neither side gains a clear mechanical edge.
RETURN GAME EDGE

With identical service numbers (63% each), the match is likely to swing on return points rather than serve dominance. Van Assche's 47% return rate is 11 points above Lajovic's 36%, meaning he converts a meaningfully higher share of return points into games — a real mechanical advantage that isn't captured by the ranking gap alone.

FORM AND CLASS GAP

Van Assche arrives on a 5-match win streak (9-1 in his last 10) with a rising Elo and ranking trajectory (+9 spots, 1891 vs 1807 Elo). Lajovic, meanwhile, is 4-10 over the same span with two straight losses and a stagnant ranking trend. Both trajectories point the same direction, reinforcing the favorite's statistical case beyond the raw numbers.

RUST VS RHYTHM

Van Assche has gone 22 days without a match and has zero matches in the last 14 days — the model flags this layoff as a rustiness risk. Lajovic, by contrast, played 12 days ago and has one match in the same recent window, giving him more competitive sharpness. This context tempers, but does not cancel, the favorite's statistical edge.

CONDITIONS

Warm, humid weather (29°C, 62% humidity, 12 km/h wind) typically favors longer, more physical rallies and tests stamina. Since both players serve at an identical 63% rate, the conditions don't clearly tilt the match toward either side based on the data available.

VALUE READ

The model gives van Assche 58%, close to the market's implied 59%, with the resulting expected value at -1.8%. This is a case of the model largely agreeing with the market rather than uncovering an edge. Van Assche is the legitimate favorite on return-game strength and current form, but the price already reflects that — there's no value here, just confirmation of the favorite tag.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). The model ≈ the market on average; the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →